Key points
- "Up to 90%" is a ceiling, not a rate. The base share is a different number.
- Payout eligibility and payout frequency are separate facts; neither implies the other.
- "Daily payouts" describes frequency and says nothing about when the first one is possible.
- The conditions attached to a payout are usually where a consistency rule finally applies.
The split: base, ceiling and condition
The profit split is the share of net profit that goes to the trader. Most firms in the current record publish a figure between 80% and 100%, and most of them publish it in one of three shapes.
| Published as | What it means | How Rex records it |
|---|---|---|
| "80% profit split" | A flat base rate | Base 80% |
| "Up to 90%" | A ceiling reached under some condition | Maximum 90%, base share not published |
| "80%, rising to 90% after…" | A base with a stated scaling condition | Base 80%, maximum 90%, with the condition |
The middle row is the one worth slowing down on. "Up to 90%" tells you the best case and nothing about the normal case. Rex will not record it as a 90% split, because that would present a ceiling as a rate; it records the ceiling and marks the base share as not published.
Eligibility: when you can first ask
Payout eligibility is the condition that must be satisfied before a first withdrawal request is possible. It comes in several published forms.
- A number of calendar days after the account is funded.
- A number of trading days, or of profitable trading days.
- A minimum profit above the starting balance, sometimes expressed as a buffer.
- Completion of an intermediate stage, such as an exhibition or verification account.
These are not interchangeable. Fourteen calendar days and fourteen profitable trading days are separated by weeks in practice, and a buffer requirement is not a time condition at all.
Frequency: how often after that
Frequency is how often payouts can be requested once you are eligible: daily, weekly, every two weeks, monthly, or on request. It is the number firms advertise, because it sounds immediate.
A firm advertising "daily payouts" is stating a frequency. It has said nothing about when the first payout can be requested, and the two are frequently far apart. Rex records them as two separate facts and never derives one from the other, which is why a challenge page can honestly show a frequency while the eligibility reads "Not published".
In the current record several firms publish a frequency and no eligibility, and Rex shows exactly that rather than inventing a plausible number of days.
The conditions attached to a payout
A payout request is usually reviewed, and the review applies rules that may not have bitten during trading.
- Consistency — where a rule applies at payout, one strong day can hold back a withdrawal from an account that already passed. See consistency rules explained.
- Minimum profitable days — a payout condition on several futures plans, distinct from minimum trading days during the evaluation.
- Buffer retention — some plans require part of the profit to remain in the account after a withdrawal.
- Conduct review — trades that breached a news or holding rule can be removed from the calculation retrospectively.
None of these is unusual or hidden. They are published, generally in the funded-account terms rather than on the pricing page, which is why Rex records the terms document as a separate source.
Reading a payout section properly
- Find the base shareNot the ceiling. If only a ceiling is published, treat the base as unknown.
- Find the first-payout conditionDays, profitable days, or a profit threshold — and whether an intermediate account stands in between.
- Find the frequency after thatAnd whether it changes as the account scales.
- Find the consistency rule and where it appliesEvaluation, payout, or both.
- Find what happens to the bufferWhether a withdrawal resets any trailing floor or account level.
Every challenge page in Rex shows the split, the first-payout eligibility and the subsequent frequency as three separate rows, each with its own source and its own "not published" state where the firm is silent.
What the record shows
Splits of 80% and 90% dominate the current snapshot, and several firms publish only a ceiling. Payout eligibility is the least-published field across the whole dataset: many firms state a frequency on the pricing page and put the eligibility in a document Rex has not reached, so the field reads as not collected.
That gap is visible rather than filled. Open any challenge and read the "what is missing" panel, or browse the source registry to see which pages have been read for each firm.
Common questions
Is a 90% split better than an 80% split?
On that field alone, yes. But a 90% ceiling with an unpublished base, a strict consistency rule and a late first payout can pay less in practice than a flat 80%. The split is one of four facts, not the answer.
What does "daily payouts" actually mean?
That once you are eligible, requests can be made daily. It says nothing about the first request, which is a separate published condition.
Do I lose the profit if I do not withdraw it?
Generally no, but some plans reset a buffer or a trailing floor on withdrawal, which changes your room afterwards. It is published in the funded-account terms.
Why does Rex show a frequency but no eligibility?
Because that is what the firm published. Deriving an eligibility from a frequency would be inventing a number.
Compare the options this guide mentions
Opens 3 challenge options side by side, with every field that cannot honestly be compared marked rather than averaged.