RexPropFirm
Get Started

Compare firms

Two whole firms side by side: what each publishes across markets, platforms, fees, loss models, permissions and payouts. Rex describes differences and never declares a winner.

Comparing two purchasable plans instead? Compare challenges.

Alpha Capital Group
Forex · CFD

Alpha Capital Group is a UK-headquartered Forex / CFD prop firm running evaluations and an Alpha Direct instant-funding line from $5,000 to $200,000 on MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker and DXtrade. Alpha Direct carries a 5% trailing drawdown that locks at the starting balance, a 3% daily soft breach, a 90% split and a 15% best-day ceiling on payouts; total allocation across its programs is capped at $400,000 per trader.

Audacity Capital
Forex · CFD

Audacity Capital has been funding traders since 2012. Its trading activity is operated through AudaCity Global LTD under a Union of Comoros brokerage licence, with a UK office at 25 Cabot Square, London. Account sizes and prices below are carried from the public directory.

Shareable link

Quick highlights

The differences most likely to change a decision, stated neutrally. Rex names no winner, because which of these matters depends entirely on how you trade.

  • Market

    Alpha Capital GroupForex · CFD

    Audacity CapitalForex · CFD

    Both operate in the same market, so their published rules use comparable units.

  • Entry price

    Alpha Capital GroupForex · CFD · USD · one-time · $27

    Audacity CapitalForex · CFD · USD · one-time · $49

    Entry price is the advertised figure only. Activation and reset charges are recorded separately and often decide the real cost.

  • Profit split (base)

    Alpha Capital Group90%

    Audacity Capital75%

    A published base share is a commitment. A ceiling with no stated base is not, and Rex records it as not published rather than as the headline number.

  • Choice of plans

    Alpha Capital Group54 options

    Audacity Capital15 options

    More options means more chance of a size and structure that suits you; it says nothing about the quality of any single plan.

  • Evaluation structures

    Alpha Capital GroupInstant · 1-step · 2-step

    Audacity Capital2-step · 1-step · Instant

    One-step and two-step evaluations distribute the same difficulty differently. Neither is easier as a rule.

  • Evidence coverage

    Alpha Capital Group30% documented

    Audacity Capital30% documented

    This measures how much of each firm Rex could source, not how good the firm is. A lower figure means less was published, not worse terms.

What the split difference is actually worth

Your assumptions, each firm's published split. Not a forecast, and not a reason on its own to pick either firm.

A 8% return on $100,000 is $8,000 gross per cycle, before each firm’s split.

Alpha Capital Group

Split applied
90%
Your share per cycle
$7,200
Across 3 cycles
$21,600
Less the entry price
− $27
Net
$21,573

Audacity Capital

Split applied
75%
Your share per cycle
$6,000
Across 3 cycles
$18,000
Less the entry price
− $49
Net
$17,951

This is arithmetic on your own assumptions, not a forecast. It ignores the thing that actually decides the outcome — whether you can reach a payout at all under each firm’s loss limit — and it ignores activation fees, resets and trading costs. Use it to see how much the split difference is worth, then go and read the drawdown model.

Published summary

Straight from the record. A blank is a real gap, not a formatting choice, and each sourced value can be opened to the page it was read from.

  • Operating statusCOMPARED
    Alpha
    Audacity

    The status this firm is currently recorded as operating under. A provisional status is read from a secondary source and not yet confirmed on the firm's own page.

  • MarketsCOMPARED
    Alpha
    Forex · CFDDerived
    Audacity
    Forex · CFDDerived

    Both operate in the same market, so their published rules use comparable units.

  • HeadquartersCOMPARED
    Alpha
    Audacity

    The country the firm publishes as its headquarters.

  • FoundedCOMPARED
    Alpha
    Audacity

    The year the firm states it was founded; a blank means it was not published, not that the firm is new.

  • Challenge optionsCOMPARED
    Alpha
    54 optionsDerived
    Audacity
    15 optionsDerived

    More options means more chance of a size and structure that suits you; it says nothing about the quality of any single plan.

  • Evaluation structuresCOMPARED
    Alpha
    Instant · 1-step · 2-stepDerived
    Audacity
    2-step · 1-step · InstantDerived

    One-step and two-step evaluations distribute the same difficulty differently. Neither is easier as a rule.

  • Published starting pricesCOMPARED
    Alpha
    Forex · CFDDerived
    Audacity
    Forex · CFDDerived

    The advertised entry price only. Activation and reset charges are recorded separately and often decide the real cost; monthly and one-time prices are not the same cost and are never compared.

  • Profit split (base)COMPARED
    Alpha
    90%Derived
    Audacity
    75%Derived

    A published base share is a commitment. A ceiling with no stated base is not, and Rex records it as not published rather than as the headline number.

  • Research depthCOMPARED
    Alpha
    Full research
    Audacity
    Partial research

    Evidence coverage of the firm, assigned by Rex research. It is not a quality, safety or Rex Score judgement.

  • Data ConfidenceCOMPARED
    Alpha
    30% documentedDerived
    Audacity
    30% documentedDerived

    How much of each firm Rex could source, not how good the firm is. A lower figure means less was published, not worse terms.

Change history

Terms change quietly. Each change is recorded only when two accepted observations differ; an empty list is the honest state for a first-seen record.

The record

Recent changes

What changed on this firm's own pages, when Rex read the difference, and what it changed from.

No material changes recorded yet. Rex records a change only when two accepted observations of the same field differ, so a first-seen record has nothing to show. See this firm’s change history.

Platforms, instruments and permissions

Alpha Capital Group

Platforms
MT5 · cTrader · TradeLocker · DXtrade
Instruments
FX · Metals · Indices · Oil
Loss models
Trailing — Trailing · measurement not published · 5% · Static — Static · 10% of initial balance · Daily loss — 3% · basis not published
Permissions
News trading: Restricted · High-impact events listed on ForexFactory or Myfxbook · Overnight holding: Not collected · Weekend holding: Prohibited
Payout policy
Profit split: 90% · Payout cadence: First payout eligibility not published · then every On demand, after 7 profitable trading days, a 3% profit buffer, then a minimum request of 1% of gross profits

Audacity Capital

Platforms
Not collected
Instruments
Not collected
Loss models
Static — Static · 15% of initial balance · Daily loss — 7.5% · basis not published
Permissions
News trading: Not collected · Overnight holding: Not collected · Weekend holding: Not collected
Payout policy
Profit split: 75% · Payout cadence: First payout eligibility not published · then every 2 weeks

Reviews

Read them
Nothing to show here yet.

Offers and activity

All offers
Nothing to show here yet.

Country availability

Where each firm opens accounts. A firm that says nothing about your country is unknown, never available. Rows marked preview are examples, not firm statements.

Related comparisons

Common pairings across both markets, generated from the record rather than from traffic.

Alpha Capital Group plansAudacity Capital plansCompare two plans instead

Alpha Capital Group and Audacity Capital are described here from what each publishes. Where a field is blank for one firm and filled for the other, that is a difference in disclosure rather than a difference in quality.

Where to go next