Compare firms
Two whole firms side by side: what each publishes across markets, platforms, fees, loss models, permissions and payouts. Rex describes differences and never declares a winner.
Comparing two purchasable plans instead? Compare challenges.
TradeFundrr funds simulated futures, stock, options and crypto accounts of up to $100,000, paid weekly every Friday with up to an 80% split. Its published drawdown starts $3,000 below the starting balance, trails upward and locks at the starting balance once the first payout is taken.
Blue Guardian Futures is the futures line of Iconic Exchange FZCO, trading on MT5, Match-Trader, NinjaTrader, TradeLocker, TradingView, Tradovate and DeepCharts, with an indefinite maximum number of trading days. Account sizes and prices below are carried from the public directory.
Shareable link
Quick highlights
The differences most likely to change a decision, stated neutrally. Rex names no winner, because which of these matters depends entirely on how you trade.
Market
TradeFundrrFutures
Blue Guardian FuturesFutures
Both operate in the same market, so their published rules use comparable units.
Entry price
TradeFundrrNot collected
Blue Guardian FuturesFutures · USD · one-time · $64
Entry price is the advertised figure only. Activation and reset charges are recorded separately and often decide the real cost.
Profit split (base)
TradeFundrrNot published
Blue Guardian Futures90%
A published base share is a commitment. A ceiling with no stated base is not, and Rex records it as not published rather than as the headline number.
Choice of plans
TradeFundrr1 options
Blue Guardian Futures16 options
More options means more chance of a size and structure that suits you; it says nothing about the quality of any single plan.
Evaluation structures
TradeFundrr1-step
Blue Guardian FuturesInstant · 1-step
One-step and two-step evaluations distribute the same difficulty differently. Neither is easier as a rule.
Evidence coverage
TradeFundrr30% documented
Blue Guardian Futures26% documented
This measures how much of each firm Rex could source, not how good the firm is. A lower figure means less was published, not worse terms.
What the split difference is actually worth
Your assumptions, each firm's published split. Not a forecast, and not a reason on its own to pick either firm.
A 8% return on $100,000 is $8,000 gross per cycle, before each firm’s split.
TradeFundrr
- Split applied
- 80% · assumed
- Your share per cycle
- $6,400
- Across 3 cycles
- $19,200
- Less the entry price
- price not collected
- Net
- $19,200
This firm publishes a ceiling rather than a base share, so the model applies 80% and says so rather than using the headline figure.
Blue Guardian Futures
- Split applied
- 90%
- Your share per cycle
- $7,200
- Across 3 cycles
- $21,600
- Less the entry price
- − $64
- Net
- $21,536
This is arithmetic on your own assumptions, not a forecast. It ignores the thing that actually decides the outcome — whether you can reach a payout at all under each firm’s loss limit — and it ignores activation fees, resets and trading costs. Use it to see how much the split difference is worth, then go and read the drawdown model.
Published summary
Straight from the record. A blank is a real gap, not a formatting choice, and each sourced value can be opened to the page it was read from.
- Operating status
- TradeFundrr
- Blue
The status this firm is currently recorded as operating under. A provisional status is read from a secondary source and not yet confirmed on the firm's own page.
- Markets
- TradeFundrr
- FuturesDerived
- Blue
- FuturesDerived
Both operate in the same market, so their published rules use comparable units.
- Headquarters
- TradeFundrr
- Blue
The country the firm publishes as its headquarters.
- Founded
- TradeFundrr
- Blue
The year the firm states it was founded; a blank means it was not published, not that the firm is new.
- Challenge options
- TradeFundrr
- 1 optionsDerived
- Blue
- 16 optionsDerived
More options means more chance of a size and structure that suits you; it says nothing about the quality of any single plan.
- Evaluation structures
- TradeFundrr
- 1-stepDerived
- Blue
- Instant · 1-stepDerived
One-step and two-step evaluations distribute the same difficulty differently. Neither is easier as a rule.
- Published starting prices
- TradeFundrr
- Not collectedDerived
- Blue
- FuturesDerived
The advertised entry price only. Activation and reset charges are recorded separately and often decide the real cost; monthly and one-time prices are not the same cost and are never compared.
- Profit split (base)
- TradeFundrr
- Not publishedDerived
- Blue
- 90%Derived
A published base share is a commitment. A ceiling with no stated base is not, and Rex records it as not published rather than as the headline number.
- Research depth
- TradeFundrr
- Full research
- Blue
- Partial research
Evidence coverage of the firm, assigned by Rex research. It is not a quality, safety or Rex Score judgement.
- Data Confidence
- TradeFundrr
- 30% documentedDerived
- Blue
- 26% documentedDerived
How much of each firm Rex could source, not how good the firm is. A lower figure means less was published, not worse terms.
Change history
Terms change quietly. Each change is recorded only when two accepted observations differ; an empty list is the honest state for a first-seen record.
The record
Recent changes
What changed on this firm's own pages, when Rex read the difference, and what it changed from.
No material changes recorded yet. Rex records a change only when two accepted observations of the same field differ, so a first-seen record has nothing to show. See this firm’s change history.
Platforms, instruments and permissions
TradeFundrr
- Platforms
- TradingView · Tradovate Prop · NinjaTrader Prop · Quantower
- Instruments
- Not collected
- Loss models
- Trailing · end of day — Trailing · end of day · $3,000
- Permissions
- News trading: Not collected · Overnight holding: Not collected · Weekend holding: Not collected
- Payout policy
- Profit split: up to 80% · base share not published · Payout cadence: First payout eligibility not published · then weekly
Blue Guardian Futures
- Platforms
- MT5 · Match-Trader · NinjaTrader · TradeLocker · TradingView · Tradovate · DeepCharts
- Instruments
- Not collected
- Loss models
- Static — Static · 6% of initial balance · Trailing · end of day — Trailing · end of day · 4% · Daily loss — 4% · basis not published
- Permissions
- News trading: Not collected · Overnight holding: Not collected · Weekend holding: Not collected
- Payout policy
- Profit split: 90% · Payout cadence: First payout eligibility not published · then daily
Reviews
Offers and activity
Country availability
Where each firm opens accounts. A firm that says nothing about your country is unknown, never available. Rows marked preview are examples, not firm statements.
TradeFundrr
PREVIEWExample: available0Example: restricted0Check your countryBlue Guardian Futures
PREVIEWExample: available0Example: restricted0Check your country
Related comparisons
Common pairings across both markets, generated from the record rather than from traffic.
- Alpha Capital Group Alpha Direct 100K vs AquaFunded Elite 100KSame currency and fee type, so prices order directly.
- Atmos Funded 1-Step Standard 100K vs Audacity Capital Ability Challenge 100KDifferent fee types or currencies; those fields are marked incompatible.
- Axi Select Acceleration 100K vs BEM Funding Classic Normal 100KDifferent fee types or currencies; those fields are marked incompatible.
- Blue Guardian 1 Step 100K vs Blueberry Funded 1 Step Classic 100KSame currency and fee type, so prices order directly.
- BrightFunded 1 Step 100K vs Crypto Fund Trader 1-Phase 100KSame currency and fee type, so prices order directly.
- City Traders Imperium 2-Step Challenge 10K vs E8 Markets E8 One 100KDifferent fee types or currencies; those fields are marked incompatible.
TradeFundrr and Blue Guardian Futures are described here from what each publishes. Where a field is blank for one firm and filled for the other, that is a difference in disclosure rather than a difference in quality.