RexPropFirm

Programme

Review bounty

A programme for verified trader experience — the kind backed by an account, a payout receipt or a rule screenshot, rather than a rating with nothing behind it.

Planned — not open yet

The terms below are what Rex commits to when the programme opens. Nothing here accepts a submission today, and no page pretends otherwise.

How it would work

  1. STEP 1

    Write from a real account

    A useful review says which plan, which account size, how long the account ran and what actually happened at payout.

  2. STEP 2

    Attach proof

    A payout confirmation or a dashboard screenshot, with personal details removed. Proof is what separates a review from an opinion.

  3. STEP 3

    Published with its evidence state

    Reviews would carry whether proof was attached and verified, so a reader can weigh them without guessing.

The terms Rex commits to

Written before the programme exists, so they cannot be quietly softened once money is involved.

  • No review bounty is paid by this planned programme. Any future reward requires published terms.
  • Review moderation and any future reward eligibility are separate decisions.
  • Firms cannot pay to remove, delay or reorder a review.
  • Database-backed reviews are signed-in submissions published after moderation. Illustrative reviews must carry a preview label.

Questions

What does a published review mean?
A database-backed review passed moderation; that does not verify every statement in it. An illustrative module is labelled separately. A review does not prove bounty participation.
Would a firm see who wrote a review?
Firms would be able to reply publicly, as they can on any review surface. Rex would not hand over a reviewer's identity.

Where to go next